Successive Action Research to Develop the Higher Order Thinking of EFL Learners Through Discussion Forums

Authors

  • Hiroshi Miyashita Tokyo Metropolitan Showa High School

Keywords:

discussion forums, blended learning, English as a foreign language (EFL), dynamic assessment, higher order thinking

Abstract

Classrooms of English as a foreign language (EFL) in Japan tend to lack learning activities to develop higher order thinking due to the test-oriented practices. The purpose of this successive action research is to explore discussion forums embedded in extracurricular blended learning programs created to develop the higher order thinking of EFL learners at a public high school in Japan, drawing on the construct of mediation from sociocultural theory. In the first program, fifteen participants engaged in online synchronous and asynchronous activities with English as a medium of instruction and communication while being supported by face-to-face sessions conducted in Japanese. Data were collected through three methods: discussion forums to obtain written texts from participants, surveys, and the researchers’ observations. Participants’ interactions posted in discussion forums are transformed into quantitative data using the Interaction Analysis Model. Then, the quantitative data are triangulated with qualitative data derived from surveys and observations. The findings of the trial program showed that participants found collaborative constructivist learning meaningful and exhibited higher order thinking development to varying degrees. However, learner-learner interaction was not so activated as expected. Based on the researcher’s reflection, the second intervention was redesigned and implemented in the cyclical process of successive action research. The last section presents the projected benefits of successive action research and suggestions for EFL educators to make informed decisions about how discussion forums can be effectively used in education.

Author Biography

Hiroshi Miyashita, Tokyo Metropolitan Showa High School

Hiroshi Miyashita is an EFL teacher at a public high school in Tokyo. He earned an MEd in teaching English as an additional language at the University of Calgary. He is currently a doctoral candidate at Athabasca University. His research interests include online learning, sociocultural theory, and language policy.

References

Anderson, T. (2003). Getting the mix right again: An updated and theoretical rationale for interaction. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v4i2.149

Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., & Bloom, B. S. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing. New York Longman.

Aoki, K. (2010). The use of ICT and e-learning in higher education in Japan. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 42, 854-858.

Bargal, D. (2006). Personal and intellectual influences leading to Lewin’s paradigm of action research: Towards the 60th anniversary of Lewin’s ‘Action research and minority problems’ (1946). Action Research, 4(4), 367–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750306070101

Barrett, T., & Miyashita, H. (2016). The pervasiveness of the neoliberal agenda and linguistic instrumentalism in Japan’s English education policy “English Reform Plan corresponding to Globalization.” Journal of English as an International Language. 11(1), 50-70.

Bloom, B. S., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. In Handbook I: Cognitive domain.

Cohen, L., Lawrence, M., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education. (8th ed.). Routledge

Conrad, D., & Openo, J. (2018). Assessment strategies for online learning: Engagement and authenticity. AU Press.

De Wever, B., Schellens, T., Valcke, M., & Van Keer, H. (2006). Content analysis schemes to analyze transcripts of online asynchronous discussion groups: A review. Computers and Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.005

Drysdale, J. S., Graham, C. R., Spring, K. J., & Halverson, L. R. (2013). An analysis of research trends in dissertations and theses studying blended learning. Internet and Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.11.003

Garrison, D. R. (2016). E-learning in the 21st century: A community of inquiry framework for research and practice (3rd ed.). Routledge.

Garrison, D. R., & Anderson, T. (2003). E-Learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. Routledge.

Glasersfeld, E. V. (1995). Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. Routledge.

Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 3-21). Pfeiffer Publishing.

Graham, C. R. (2019). Current research in blended learning. In M. G. Moore & W. C. Diehl (Eds.), Handbook of distance education (4th ed., pp. 173-188). Routledge.

Gunawardena, C. N., Lowe, C. A., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research. https://doi.org/10.2190/7MQV-X9UJ-C7Q3-NRAG

Guo, Y. (2012). Teaching English for economic competitiveness: Emerging issues and challenges in English education in China. Canadian and International Education, 41(2), 28-50.

Hall, B. M. (2014). In support of the Interaction Analysis Model (IAM) for evaluating discourse in a virtual learning community. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261161448_In_support_of_the_Interaction_Analysis_Model_for_evaluating_discourse_in_a_virtual_learning_community

Halverson, L. R., Spring, K. J., Huyett, S., Henrie, C. R., & Graham, C. R. (2017). Blended learning rearch in higher education and k-12 settings. In J. M. Spector, B. B. Lockee, & M. D. Childress (Eds.), Learning, design, and technology: An international compendium of theory, research, practice, and policy (pp. 1-30). Springer International Publishing.

Hou, H. T., Chang, K. E., & Sung, Y. T. (2009). Using blogs as a professional development tool for teachers: Analysis of interaction behavioral patterns. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820903195215

Hoven, D. (2019). ePortfolios: The role of reflection in graduate online learning and pedagogy. ICDE/WCOL 2019 Proceedings Volume 1 (pp. 431-442). Dublin City University.

Hoven, D., & Palalas, A. (2016). Ecological constructivism as a new learning theory for MALL: An open system of beliefs, observations, and informed explanations. In A. Palalas & M. Ally (Eds.), The international handbook of mobile-assisted language learning (pp. 113-137). Beijing, China: China Central Radio & TV University Press.

Jonassen, D. H. (1994). Thinking Technology: Toward a Constructivist Design Model. Educational Technology.

Kanuka, H. (2008). Understanding e-learning technologies-in-practice through philosophies-in-practice. In T. Anderson (Ed.), The theory and practice of online learning (2nd ed., pp. 91-114). AU Press.

Kemmis, S. (1997). Action research. In J. P. Keeves (ed.) Educational research, methodology, and measurement: An international handbook (2nd ed., pp. 173-179). Elsevier Science Ltd.

Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The action research planner. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-67-2

Kittaka, L. G. (2020, April 20). Coronavirus crisis offers chance to update Japanese schools. The Japan Times. https://www.japantimes.co.jp/community/2020/04/20/issues/coronavirus-crisis-japanese-schools-online/

Kubota, R. (2011). Questioning linguistic instrumentalism: English, neoliberalism, and language tests in Japan. Linguistics and Education, 22, 248-260.

Lantolf, J. P. (2011). The sociocultural approach to second language acquisition. In D. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 24-47). Routledge.

Lantolf, J. P. (2013). Sociocultural theory: A dialectical approach to L2 research. In S. M. Gass & ‎A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 57-72). Routledge.

Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2004). Dynamic assessment of L2 development: Bringing the past into the future. Journal of Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.v1i1.647

Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2011). Dynamic assessment in the classroom: Vygotskian praxis for second language development. Language Teaching Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810383328

Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a design science: Building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. Routledge.

Lucas, M., Gunawardena, C., & Moreira, A. (2014). Assessing social construction of knowledge online: A critique of the interaction analysis model. Computers in Human Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.050

Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT). (2018). 高等学校学習指導要領 [The government course guidelines for high schools]. https://www.mext.go.jp/sports/content/1384661_6_1_2.pdf

Moore, M. G. (1989). Editorial: Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923648909526659

Morrison, D. (2007). E-learning in higher education: The need for a new pedagogy. In M. Bullen & D. Janes (Eds.), Making the transition to e-learning: Strategies and issues (pp. 104-120). Idea Group Inc.

National Center for University Entrance Examinations. (2020). 大学入学共通テスト [The Common Test for University Admissions]. https://www.dnc.ac.jp/kyotsu/index.html

Ndoricimpa, C., & Barad, D. P. (2021). Does online instruction in discourse conventions of literary analysis affect L2 students’ critical stance in academic writing? A longitudinal study. AsiaCALL Online Journal, 12(4), 66 - 87. https://asiacall.info/acoj/index.php/journal/article/view/66

Nishino, T., & Watanabe, M. (2008). Communication-Oriented Policies versus Classroom Realities in Japan. TESOL Quarterly, 42(1), 133-138.

Powell, K. C., & Kalina, C. J. (2009). Cognitive and social constructivism: developing tools for an effective classroom. Education, 130(2), 241-250.

Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511667305

Rose, E. (2013). On reflection: An essay on technology, education & the status of thought in the twenty-first century. Brown Bear Press.

Sanchez Vasquez, A. (1997). The philosophy of praxis. Merlin Press.

Scheer, A., Noweski, C., & Meinel, C. (2012). Transforming constructivist learning into action: Design thinking in education. Design And Technology Education: An International Journal, 17(3). 8-19.

Thi Thanh Tran, M. (2021). Microsoft Teams in the context of freshmen ELF learning. AsiaCALL Online Journal, 12(2), 12-23. https://asiacall.info/acoj/index.php/journal/article/view/22

Vygotsky, L. S., & Rieber, R. W. (Ed.). (1997). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky, Vol. 4. The history of the development of higher mental functions. (M. J. Hall, Trans.). Plenum Press.

Wang, Q., Woo, H. L., & Zhao, J. (2009). Investigating critical thinking and knowledge construction in an interactive learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820701706320

Watson, J. (2008). Blended Learning: The Convergence of Online and Face-to-Face Education. North American Council for Online Learning.

Wee, L. (2010). Linguistic instrumentalism in Singapore. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 24(3), 211-224.

Downloads

Published

2021-10-21

How to Cite

Miyashita, H. (2021). Successive Action Research to Develop the Higher Order Thinking of EFL Learners Through Discussion Forums. AsiaCALL Online Journal, 12(5), 77-99. Retrieved from https://asiacall.info/acoj/index.php/journal/article/view/85