Discourse Analysis of EFL Students’ Attitudes and Social Interactions Towards a Virtual Classroom
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210226.009Keywords:
discourse analysis, CMC, virtual classrooms, EFL learners, attitudes and social interactionsAbstract
This paper aims to examine the discourse of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners’ attitudes and social interactions towards a virtual classroom of Hoa Sen University Mlearning System. The system is built on Moodle platform, where educators and learners are empowered to create personalized virtual classrooms in a secure and integrated environment. Through social network-like features, teachers and learners can exchange more ideas about lessons after school to promote independence in learning and strengthen social relationships. Computer-Mediated Communication (CMC) refers to interactivity between or among people through mediated communication channels. A myriad of studies on the use of CMC of foreign language learners have been conducted; however, there is little research using discourse analysis to explore students’ attitudes and social interactions in language learning contexts. This paper uses an interpretive methodology by working from quantitative and qualitative data. The participants were 100 non-English major students of an English Writing class for one semester. Besides, statistics from students’ interactions and post-interviews were analyzed based on discourse analysis. The results showed that learners had positive responses and attitudes towards the virtual classroom. Finally, some implications for EFL learning and teaching using virtual classrooms were discussed.
References
L. S. Vygotsky, Thought and Language. MIT Press, Massachusetts Institute of Technology and John Wiley and Sons, 1962.
J. Mills, Virtual classroom management and communicative writing pedagogy, European Writing Conferences, Barcelona, 1996, pp. 23-25.
M. Warschauer, Comparing Face-to-Face and Electronic Discussion in the Second Language Classroom.CALICO Journal, 13(2) (1992) 7-26.
A. Juvova, S.Chudy, P. Neumeister, J. Plischke, J. Kvintova, Reflection of constructivist theories in current educational practice. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 3(5) (2015) 345-349.
B. Benwell, E. Stokoe, Discourse and identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press Ltd, 2006.
C. N. Gunawardena, Social presence theory and implications for interaction and collaborative learning in computer conferences. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1(2/3) (1995) 147-166.
L. Rourke, T. Anderson, D. R. Garrison, W. Archer, Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. Journal of Distance Education, 14(2) (2001).
J. Richards, Developing Classroom Speaking Activities; From Theory to Practice, Guidelines, RELC, Singapore, Vol 28, No2, 2006, pp. 3-9
M. Swain, Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: a step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics 16, 3 (1995) 371–391.
M. A. K. Halliday, Language Structure and Language Function. In Lyons, J., Ed., New Horizons in Linguistics, Penguin, Harmondsworth, 1970, pp.140-165.
P. Rogers, M. Lea, Social presence in distributed group environments: The role of social identity. Behavior & Information Technology, 24(2) (2005) 151-158.
N. Jahng, W. S. Nielsen, E. K. H. Chan, Collaborative learning in an online course: A comparison of communication patterns in small and whole-group activities. Journal of Distance Education, 24(2) (2010) 39-58.
M. K. Barbour, T. C. Reeves, The reality of virtual schools: A review of the literature. Computers and Education, 52(2) (2009) 402-416.
D. L. BoUiger, Use of patterns of visual cues in computer-mediated communication. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 10(2) (2009) 95-108.
S. L. Stansberry, Effective assessment of online discourse in LIS courses. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 47(1) (2006) 27-37.
J. R. Park, Interpersonal and affective communication in synchronous online discourse. The Library Quarterly, 77 (2) (2007) 133-155.
S. T. Le, Teaching English in Vietnam: Improving the provision in the private sector. (Doctoral dissertation, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia, 2011. DOI: http://library.vu.edu.au/record=b2237480.
T. K. A. Dang, H. T. M. Nguyen, T. T. T. Le, The impacts of globalisation on EFL teacher education through English as a medium of instruction: An example from Vietnam. Current Issues inLanguage Planning, 14(1) (2013) 1–21.
X. V. Nguyen. (2004). English language teaching in Vietnam today: Policy, practice and constraints. In W. K. Ho, A. L. Y. Wong, H. W. Kam, & R. Wong (Eds.), English Language Teaching in East Asia Today: Changing Policies and Practices: Cavendish Square Publishing, 2004, pp. 447-454.
H. Hong, Đào tạo từ xa: Quá nhiều yếu kém! (Distance education: Too many weaknesses!), Dantri, 2009. DOI: http://dantri.com.vn/giao-duc-khuyenhoc/dao-tao-tu-xa-qua-nhieu-yeu-kem-358062.htm.
F. ed. Christie, Pedagogy and the Shaping of Consciousness: linguistic and social processes. London: Cassell Open Linguistics Series, 1999.
M. A. K. Halliday, An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold Ltd, 1985.
M. A. K. Halliday, Spoken and written language. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.
M.A.K. Halliday, R. Hassan, Cohesion in English. London: Longman, 1976.
S. Eggins, D. Slade, Analysing casual conversation. London: Cassell Academic, 1997.
G. Thompson, Introducing Functional Grammar. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, 1996/2000.
C. F. Brooks, Don’t even trip, u did your part: Analysing community in online student talk. Classroom Discourse, 4 (2) (2013) 168-189.
N. Ziegler, Synchronous computer-mediated communication and interaction. A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38 (2016) 553-586.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Tran Quang Hai
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright
The copyright of all articles published in the Proceedings of the AsiaCALL International Conference (paic) remains with the Authors, i.e. Authors retain full ownership of their article. Permitted third-party reuse of the open access articles is defined by the applicable Creative Commons (CC) end-user license which is accepted by the Authors upon submission of their paper. All articles in the aicp are published under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license, meaning that end users can freely share an article (i.e. copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt it (i.e. remix, transform and build upon the material) on the condition that proper attribution is given (i.e. appropriate credit, a link to the applicable license and an indication if any changes were made; all in such a way that does not suggest that the licensor endorses the user or the use) and the material is only used for non-commercial purposes.
