Blog-based peer response for EFL writing: A case study in Vietnam


  • Vu Phi Ho Pham Van Lang University
  • Siriluck Usaha Suranaree University of technology


Blog-based peer response, Computer mediated, peer response


Electronic peer response or E-peer response has recently been introduced to help L2 student writers improve their writing. However, few studies have been conducted to see how thenew medium of the blog platform in the world of the Internet users (bloggers) today can be applied effectively in a real EFL context. Twelve 2ndyear English major students taking a 15-week academic writing course at a Vietnamese university in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, participated in this study. The students used blogsto post their essays, were trained in a 6-step procedure of peer response; then they provided and received comments two times from their peers on the first and the second drafts for revisions. The data were collectedduring5 weeks oncause/effect essays including drafts 1 –3, students‟ comments,semi-structured interviews, and learning journals. The quantitative analysis showed thatthe 4 most common types of comments generated via the blog-based peer response were“clarification”, “suggestion/ advice”, “explanation”, and “alteration”.The study also found that the comments did affect the students writing quality based on both the qualitative and quantitative analyses. Finally, most students expressedpositive attitudes toward using blog-based peer response in the writing classroom.The study highlights a relatively new form of technology that can be used to help EFL students become better writers.


Berg, E. C. (1999). The Effects of Trained Peer Response ESL Students‟ Revision Types and

Writing Quality. Journal of second language writing, 8 (3), 215 – 241.

Braine, G. (1997). Beyond word processing: Networked computers in ESL writing classes. Computers

and Composition, 14 (1), 45-58.

Braine, G. (2001). A study of English as a foreign language (EFL) writers on a local-area network (LAN)

and in traditional classes. Computers and Composition, 18 (3), 275-292.

Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Teaching and Researching Motivation. Harlow: Pearson Education Ltd.

Gartner (2007). Predicts 2007 Blog. Retrieved on Nov. 21st, 2007 at

Hedge, T. (2002). Teaching and learning in the language classroom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hyland, K. (2003). Second Language Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hyland, K. & Hyland, F. (Eds.)(2006). Feedback in second Language writing. New York: Cambridge

University Press.

Hughes, A. (2003). Testing for Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Jones et al. (2006). Interactional dynamics in online and face-to-face peer-tutoring sessions for second language writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15 (1), 1-23.

Lien, K. (2006). Oct. 12th, 2006. Bay nam hoc o pho thong: Tai sao khong biet noi tieng Anh?. Retrieved

Nov. 17th, 2006, from

Lightfoot, M. J. (2006) A comparative analysis of e-mail and face-to-face communication in an educational environment. The Internet and Higher Education, 9 (3), 217-227.

Liu, J. & Hansen, G. J. (2005). Peer Response in Second Language Writing Classroom. U.S.A: The

University of Michigan Press.

Liu, J. & Sadler, R. W (2003). The effect and affect of peer review in electronic versus traditional modes on L2 writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2 (3), 193-227.

Luu, Q. Thanh (2006, August, 12th). De ra Kieu Ay Thi Con Nhieu Tai Tieng. Retrieved on June 3, 2007

from Michaels,

B. (2007). Quotations from Writers. Retrieved on June 11, 2007, at

Mai, H. (2006, Nov. 4th). Ket noi giao vien voi tuong lai thong tin. Retrieved on June 20th


Min, H. T. (2005). Training students to become successful peer reviewers. System, 33 (2), 293-308.

Nguyen, T. K. Thu (2002). Error Feedback in L2 Writing Classes: How explicit does it need to be?

Master of TESOL research, University of Social Sciences & Humanities, HCMC.

Nguyen, T. T. Ha (2004). The use of group work in foreign language classes: Factors leading to success.

Master of TESOL research, University of Social Sciences & Humanities, HCM City, Vietnam.

Nunan, D. (Ed.), (1993). Collaborative Language Learning and Teaching. Great Britain: Bell & Bain Ltd.

Oppenheim, A. N. (1999). Questionnaire Design, Interviewing and Attitude Measurement. London: Biddles Ltd.

Oshima, A. & Hogue, A. (2006). Writing Academic English (4th ed.). New York: Pearson Education, Inc.

Richards, C. J. & Lockhart, C. (2000). Reflective teaching in second language classrooms. UK: Cambridge University Press.

Reid, J. (1995). Teaching ESL Writing. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents in Carter, R. & Nunan, D. (eds.) (2002). Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rodriguez, R. R. (2003). Computer-Mediated Peer Response and Its Impact on Revision in The College

Spanish Classroom: A Case Study. Doctoral Dissertation, College of Arts & Sciences and College of Education University of South Florida.

Stanley, J. (1992). Coaching student writers to be effective peer evaluators. Journal of Second Language Writing, (1), (3), 217-233.

Sullivan, N. & Pratt, E. (1996). A comparative study of two ESL writing environments: a computer-assisted classroom and a traditional oral classroom. System, 29 (4), pp. 491 – 501, 1996.

Sangarun, P. (2003). Task-based instruction should be implemented in Thai University English Language classrooms. Suranaree Journal of Social Science, Vol. 10 (1); January-March, 2003.

Technorati (2006). State of the Blogosphere, April 2006 Part 1: On Blogosphere Growth. Retrieved on

Nov. 21st, 2007 at

Thanhnien (2005). Luu but thoi @. Retried on Nov. 21st, 2007 at

Tran, Ngoc Bao (2000). A combination of skills & strategies and genre analysis approaches in designing a course to improve magazine writing. Master of TESOL, University of Social Sciences and Humanities, HCM City, Vietnam.

Tran, P. L. Phan (2006, August 26th). Đổi mới cách đào tạo giáo viên văn. Retrieved on June 3, 2007 at

Tseng, S. C. & Tsai, C. C. (2007). On-line peer assessment and the role of the peer feedback: A study of high school computer course. Computers & Education, 49 (4), 1161-1174.

Tsui, B.M. Amy & Ng, Maria (2000). Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments? Journal of Second Language Writing (9), (2), pp. 147–170.

Tuoitre (2006, August 11). Loi gioi thieu: Blog 360 do - Nhung sac mau cuoc song. Retrieved on Nov. 21st, 2007 at

Tuoitre (2007). Ban Tron: Day Van, Hoc Van: Toi Chang He Bang Hoang. Retrieved on June 3, 2007 at

Tuzi, K. (2004). The impact of e-feedback on the revisions of L2 writers in an academic writing course. Computers and Composition, 21 (2), 217-235.

Vietnamnet (2007). Yahoo khong man ma voi thi truong Vietnam. Retrieved on Nov. 22nd, 2007 at

Vnexpress (2006, August, 11). Bai Van Dat Diem 10 Chep Tu Bai Van Mau. Retrieved on June 3, 2007, at

Warschauer, M. (1996). Computer Assisted Language Learning: an Introduction. Retrieved on June 4, 2007, at

Warschauer, M. & Turbee, L. and Roberts, B. (1996). Computer learning networks and student empowerment. System, 24 (1), 1-14.

Warschauer, M. (2002). Networking into Academic Discourse. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 1 (1), 45–58.

Weigle, C. Sara (2002). Assessing Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Weir, J. Cyril (1990). Communicative Language Testing. UK: Prentice Hall International (UK) Ltd.

Wennerstrom, A. (2006). Discourse Analysis in the Language Classroom – Volume 2. Genres of Writing. USA: The University of Michigan Press.

Zhu, W. (2001). Interaction and feedback in mixed peer response groups. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10 (4), 251–276.




How to Cite

Pham, V. P. H., & Usaha, S. (2009). Blog-based peer response for EFL writing: A case study in Vietnam. AsiaCALL Online Journal, 4(1), 1-29. Retrieved from