Written Corrective Feedback Strategies Applied by Van Lang University’s EFL Lecturers in Teaching Online
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54855/acoj.221322Keywords:
Written corrective feedback, WCF strategies, writing, online platform, EFL lecturersAbstract
During the covid-19 pandemic, many changes occurred that disrupted our lives. Authors must adapt to survive, and learning through online platforms is a change that forces us to adapt to avoid disrupting the learning process. The primary goal of this research project is to investigate the WCF techniques used by 30 teachers while teaching writing English online. The research instrument sets comprised 16 questions, including open and closed ones. The study uses quantitative and qualitative methods. This research paper is a timely complement to the topic of WCF strategies. It will serve as a resource for many teachers who are unsure about using the WCF approach when teaching writing online.
References
Amrhein, H. R., & Nassaji, H. (2010). Written Corrective Feedback: What do Students and Teachers Think is Right and Why?. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(2), 95–127. Retrieved from https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/CJAL/article/view/19886
Bitchener, J. (2008). Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(2), 102–118. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2007.11.004
Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2009). The value of a focused approach to written corrective feedback. ELT Journal, 63(3), 204–211. doi:10.1093/elt/ccn043
Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2009). The Contribution of Written Corrective Feedback to Language Development: A Ten-Month Investigation. Applied Linguistics, 31(2), 193-214. doi:10.1093/applin/amp016
Chen, S., Nassaji, H., & Liu, Q. (2016). EFL learners’ perceptions and preferences of written corrective feedback: a case study of university students from Mainland China. Asian-Pacific journal of second and foreign language education, 1(1), 1-17.
Ferris, D. R. (2004). The ‘‘Grammar Correction’’ debate in L2 writing: Where are we, and where do authors go from here? (and what do authors do in the meantime...?). Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 49–62.
Ferris, D. R. (2006). Does mistakes feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and long-term effects of written mistakes correction. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Perspectives on response. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ferris, D. R., Liu, H., Sinha, A., & Senna, M. (2013). Written corrective feedback for individual L2 writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(3), 307–329. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.009
Hosseiny, M. (2014). The role of direct and indirect written corrective feedback in improving Iranian EFL students’ writing skill. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 668-674.
Kang, E., & Han, Z. (2015). The Efficacy of Written Corrective Feedback in Improving L2 Written Accuracy: A Meta-Analysis. The Modern Language Journal, 99(1), 1–18. doi:10.1111/modl.12189
Kılıçkaya, F. (2019). Pre-service language teachers’ online written corrective feedback preferences and timing of feedback in computer-supported L2 grammar instruction. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-26.
Le, M. T. (2021). Students’ Attitude Towards Using Smartphones and Portable Devices for Studying Writing. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 1(3), 54–64. Retrieved from http://i-jte.org/index.php/journal/article/view/13
Lira-Gonzales, M.-L., & Nassaji, H. (2020). The Amount and Usefulness of Written Corrective Feedback Across Different Educational Contexts and Levels. TESL Canada Journal, 37(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v37i2.1333
Mao, Z., & Lee, I. (2020). Feedback scope in written corrective feedback: Analysis of empirical research in L2 contexts. Assessing Writing, 45, 100469. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2020.100469
Nakamura, S. (2018). Insights from Studies on Written Corrective Feedback: Implications for Language Pedagogy. REFLections, 22, 89-102. Retrieved from https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/reflections/article/view/112330
Shintani, N., & Aubrey, S. (2016). The Effectiveness of Synchronous and Asynchronous Written Corrective Feedback on Grammatical Accuracy in a Computer-Mediated Environment. The Modern Language Journal, 100(1), 296– 319. doi:10.1111/modl.12317
Tran, T. M. L., & Nguyen, T. T. H. (2021). The Impacts of Technology-based Communication on EFL Students’ Writing. AsiaCALL Online Journal, 12(5), 54-76. Retrieved from https://asiacall.info/acoj/index.php/journal/article/view/80
Tran, T. T. M. (2021). Use of Self-regulated Learning Strategies in Paragraph Writing at Van Lang University. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 1(3), 1–13. Retrieved from http://i-jte.org/index.php/journal/article/view/80
Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language
Learning, 46, 327–369
Wang, T., & Jiang, L. (2015). Studies on Written Corrective Feedback: Theoretical Perspectives, Empirical Evidence, and Future Directions. English Language Teaching, 8(1), 110-120.
Wei, W., & Cao, Y. (. (2020, July-September). Written Corrective Feedback Strategies Employed by University English Lecturers: A Teacher Cognition Perspective. SAGE Journals, 10(3), 1-12. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/epub/10.1177/2158244020934886
Yu, S., Zhang, Y., Zheng, Y., & Lin, Z. (2020). Written corrective feedback strategies in English-Chinese translation classrooms. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 29(2), 101-111.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Nguyen Huyen Uyen Nhi, Duong Ly Nhat Tam, Pham Vu Phi Ho
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright
The copyright of all articles published in the AsiaCALL Online Journal (acoj) remains with the Authors, i.e. Authors retain full ownership of their article. Permitted third-party reuse of the open access articles is defined by the applicable Creative Commons (CC) end-user license which is accepted by the Authors upon submission of their paper. All articles in the acoj are published under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license, meaning that end users can freely share an article (i.e. copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt it (i.e. remix, transform and build upon the material) on the condition that proper attribution is given (i.e. appropriate credit, a link to the applicable license and an indication if any changes were made; all in such a way that does not suggest that the licensor endorses the user or the use) and the material is only used for non-commercial purposes.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository, in a journal or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process.