Written Corrective Feedback Strategies Applied by Van Lang University’s EFL Lecturers in Teaching Online





Written corrective feedback, WCF strategies, writing, online platform, EFL lecturers


During the covid-19 pandemic, many changes occurred that disrupted our lives. Authors must adapt to survive, and learning through online platforms is a change that forces us to adapt to avoid disrupting the learning process. The primary goal of this research project is to investigate the WCF techniques used by 30 teachers while teaching writing English online. The research instrument sets comprised 16 questions, including open and closed ones. The study uses quantitative and qualitative methods. This research paper is a timely complement to the topic of WCF strategies. It will serve as a resource for many teachers who are unsure about using the WCF approach when teaching writing online.

Author Biographies

Nguyen Huyen Uyen Nhi, Van Lang university

Nhi Nguyen Huyen Uyen is a final-year student majoring in the English Language at Van Lang University. Due to the high demands of coursework and her interest in research, she has been doing some scientific research. She also had a research paper published in the AssiaCALL Online Journal. Because she had little experience in conducting research, each of her research papers was supervised by her professors, who had substantial research experience. Contact mail: uyennhi09012000@gmail.com

Duong Ly Nhat Tam, Faculty of Foreign Languages, Van Lang University, Vietnam

Tam Duong Ly Nhat is a junior student majoring in the English Language at Van Lang University. Because of the requests for her degree,  she has been doing scientific research. Moreover, she had a research paper published in the AssiaCALL Online Journal. Because she had little experience in doing research, she was guided by professors with extensive research experience in her conducting research process. Contact mail: duonglynhattam@gmail.com

Pham Vu Phi Ho, Faculty of Foreign Languages, Van Lang University, Vietnam

Assoc. Prof. Pham Vu Phi Ho, Ph.D., Assoc. Dean of the Faculty of Foreign Languages, Van Lang University, Vietnam. He used to be a Vice-President of Ba Ria – Vung Tau University, and Vice-President and Dean of Faculty of Foreign Languages of Van Hien University, Vietnam. Pham has been published 56 research articles in both local and International Journals (ISI/Scopus-indexed), and 8 books and course-books, 2 course-books were used for undergrad students at HCMC Open University, VN, and one course-book was used for both the undergraduate and graduate level at Lourdes College, Higher Education Department, Cagayan de Oro City, Philippines. He is the Vice President for Administrative Affairs of the AsiaCALL and the managing editor of its Online Journal. He is now the Editor-in-chief of the International Journal of TESOL & Education. He is also an editor for the Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics (Scopus), an editor for the World Journal of English Language (scopus), and a peer reviewer for some international Journals indexed in ISI/Scopus such as Computer Assisted Language Learning, Open Sage, International Journal of Instruction. His main interests include Academic Writing, peer responses, translation, Teaching methodologies, and Technology-enhanced learning. 


Amrhein, H. R., & Nassaji, H. (2010). Written Corrective Feedback: What do Students and Teachers Think is Right and Why?. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(2), 95–127. Retrieved from https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/CJAL/article/view/19886

Bitchener, J. (2008). Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(2), 102–118. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2007.11.004

Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2009). The value of a focused approach to written corrective feedback. ELT Journal, 63(3), 204–211. doi:10.1093/elt/ccn043

Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2009). The Contribution of Written Corrective Feedback to Language Development: A Ten-Month Investigation. Applied Linguistics, 31(2), 193-214. doi:10.1093/applin/amp016

Chen, S., Nassaji, H., & Liu, Q. (2016). EFL learners’ perceptions and preferences of written corrective feedback: a case study of university students from Mainland China. Asian-Pacific journal of second and foreign language education, 1(1), 1-17.

Ferris, D. R. (2004). The ‘‘Grammar Correction’’ debate in L2 writing: Where are we, and where do authors go from here? (and what do authors do in the meantime...?). Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 49–62.

Ferris, D. R. (2006). Does mistakes feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and long-term effects of written mistakes correction. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Perspectives on response. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ferris, D. R., Liu, H., Sinha, A., & Senna, M. (2013). Written corrective feedback for individual L2 writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(3), 307–329. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.009

Hosseiny, M. (2014). The role of direct and indirect written corrective feedback in improving Iranian EFL students’ writing skill. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 668-674.

Kang, E., & Han, Z. (2015). The Efficacy of Written Corrective Feedback in Improving L2 Written Accuracy: A Meta-Analysis. The Modern Language Journal, 99(1), 1–18. doi:10.1111/modl.12189

Kılıçkaya, F. (2019). Pre-service language teachers’ online written corrective feedback preferences and timing of feedback in computer-supported L2 grammar instruction. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-26.

Le, M. T. (2021). Students’ Attitude Towards Using Smartphones and Portable Devices for Studying Writing. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 1(3), 54–64. Retrieved from http://i-jte.org/index.php/journal/article/view/13

Lira-Gonzales, M.-L., & Nassaji, H. (2020). The Amount and Usefulness of Written Corrective Feedback Across Different Educational Contexts and Levels. TESL Canada Journal, 37(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v37i2.1333

Mao, Z., & Lee, I. (2020). Feedback scope in written corrective feedback: Analysis of empirical research in L2 contexts. Assessing Writing, 45, 100469. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2020.100469

Nakamura, S. (2018). Insights from Studies on Written Corrective Feedback: Implications for Language Pedagogy. REFLections, 22, 89-102. Retrieved from https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/reflections/article/view/112330

Shintani, N., & Aubrey, S. (2016). The Effectiveness of Synchronous and Asynchronous Written Corrective Feedback on Grammatical Accuracy in a Computer-Mediated Environment. The Modern Language Journal, 100(1), 296– 319. doi:10.1111/modl.12317

Tran, T. M. L., & Nguyen, T. T. H. (2021). The Impacts of Technology-based Communication on EFL Students’ Writing. AsiaCALL Online Journal, 12(5), 54-76. Retrieved from https://asiacall.info/acoj/index.php/journal/article/view/80

Tran, T. T. M. (2021). Use of Self-regulated Learning Strategies in Paragraph Writing at Van Lang University. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 1(3), 1–13. Retrieved from http://i-jte.org/index.php/journal/article/view/80

Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language

Learning, 46, 327–369

Wang, T., & Jiang, L. (2015). Studies on Written Corrective Feedback: Theoretical Perspectives, Empirical Evidence, and Future Directions. English Language Teaching, 8(1), 110-120.

Wei, W., & Cao, Y. (. (2020, July-September). Written Corrective Feedback Strategies Employed by University English Lecturers: A Teacher Cognition Perspective. SAGE Journals, 10(3), 1-12. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/epub/10.1177/2158244020934886

Yu, S., Zhang, Y., Zheng, Y., & Lin, Z. (2020). Written corrective feedback strategies in English-Chinese translation classrooms. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 29(2), 101-111.




How to Cite

Nguyen, H. U. N., Duong, L. N. T., & Pham, V. P. H. (2022). Written Corrective Feedback Strategies Applied by Van Lang University’s EFL Lecturers in Teaching Online. AsiaCALL Online Journal, 13(2), 21-41. https://doi.org/10.54855/acoj.221322