Decoding Scholarcy website: A Study on its Research Summarization Efficiency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54855/paic.2465Keywords:
AI-powered summarization, academic literature, research efficiency, ScholarcyAbstract
The development of artificial intelligence (AI) has revolutionized various facets of education, particularly the research domain. With the rapid growth of scholarly literature, the need for an efficient tool for summarization has become increasingly paramount. This study proposes a quantitative investigation into the efficiency of Scholarcy (www.scholarcy.com), an AI-powered summarizer used to aid researchers in summarizing academic literature. Thirty-five postgraduate students were involved in a survey research design. After five weeks of using Scholarcy, participants were asked to complete a survey questionnaire via their email addresses to give feedback on this tool. The results indicated a positive reception when postgraduates found this AI summarizer convenient and useful for reading academic papers. On the other hand, the participants identified several drawbacks when using it including concerns about summary quality, the absence of a mobile application, and high cost, along with suggestions for further application. With the highlights of both benefits and limitations, the study hopes to contribute valuable insights into the development of AI-powered summarization tools in the future.References
Atwood, G. S. (2023). AI Tools for Summarizing Research Articles: Transforming Information Access. https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/libfacpub/99
Bailey, D., Southam, A., & Costley, J. (2021). Digital storytelling with chatbots: mapping L2 participation and perception patterns. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 18(1), pp. 85-103 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-08-2020-0170
Bailin, A. (1987). Artificial intelligence and computer-assisted language instruction: A perspective. CALICO Journal, 5(3), 25–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v5i3.25-45
Bindu, C. N. (2016). Impact of ICT on teaching and learning: A literature review. International Journal of Management and Commerce Innovations, 4(1), 24-31.
Cheng, W., & Warren, M. (1997). Having second thoughts: Student perceptions before and after a peer assessment exercise. Studies in Higher Education, 22(2), 233239. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079712331381064 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079712331381064
El Shazly, R. (2021). Effects of artificial intelligence on English speaking anxiety and speaking performance: A case study. Expert Systems, 38(3), e12667. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.12667
Fu, J. (2013). Complexity of ICT in education: A critical literature review and its implications. International Journal of education and Development using ICT, 9(1), 112-125.
Henderson, D. (2020). Benefits of ICT in Education. IDOSR Journal of Arts and Management, 5(1), 51-57.
Phan, T. N. L. (2023). Students’ Perceptions of the AI Technology Application in English Writing Classes. Proceedings of the AsiaCALL International Conference, 4, 45–62. https://doi.org/10.54855/paic.2344 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54855/paic.2344
Lowther, D. L., Inan, F. A., Strahl, J. D., & Ross, S. M. (2008). Does technology integration work when key barriers are removed? Educational Media International, 45(3), 195-213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09523980802284317
Lu, X. (2018). Natural language processing and Intelligent Computer Assisted Language Learning (ICALL). The TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching, 1–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0422
National Academy Press. (1989). Information Technology and the Conduct of Research: The User's View. National Academy Press.
Renn, O. (2021). Science communication in crisis? Can new technologies help and support?
Weert, T. V., & Tatnall, A. (2005). Information and Communication Technologies and Real-Life Learning: New Education for the New Knowledge Society. Springer.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Bui Thi Xuan Huong, Bui Van Hieu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright
The copyright of all articles published in the Proceedings of the AsiaCALL International Conference (paic) remains with the Authors, i.e. Authors retain full ownership of their article. Permitted third-party reuse of the open access articles is defined by the applicable Creative Commons (CC) end-user license which is accepted by the Authors upon submission of their paper. All articles in the aicp are published under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license, meaning that end users can freely share an article (i.e. copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt it (i.e. remix, transform and build upon the material) on the condition that proper attribution is given (i.e. appropriate credit, a link to the applicable license and an indication if any changes were made; all in such a way that does not suggest that the licensor endorses the user or the use) and the material is only used for non-commercial purposes.