Students' Perceptions of the AI Technology Application in English Writing Classes




Artificial intelligence (AI), AI writing tools, Perceptions, English writing, Vietnamese students


With the rapid advancement of information technology, numerous cutting-edge techniques and technologies have been developed to improve learning generally and English learning specifically. The utilization of artificial intelligence (AI) technology in teaching and learning at universities is an inevitable trend in the Industry 4.0 era. This paper aims to investigate students' perceptions of AI technology application in English writing classes. 100 students from four General English classes at Vietnam National University (VNU) took part in this study. To achieve the research purpose, I combined quantitative and qualitative research methods through questionnaires and in-depth interviews. The findings of the study indicate that students' attitudes regarding AI writing tools were favourable in terms of their accessibility, adaptability, and simplicity. However, some challenges are unavoidable when employing these tools, resulting from factors like learners' technology anxiety and lack of tool variety. I hope this research serves as a valuable resource for teachers looking to diversify their teaching methods and encourages students to enhance their interest and motivation in using AI tools for English learning.

Author Biography

Phan Thi Ngoc Le, VNU University of Languages and International Studies, Vietnam National University, Hanoi

Dr. Phan Thị Ngọc Lệ is currently an English lecturer at VNU University of Languages and International Studies, Vietnam National University, Hanoi. Her research interests include English Linguistics, World Englishes, L1 transfer to L2, Language and Technology, English for specific purposes, Peer assessment, and Academic writing.


Alhalangy, A. G. I., & AbdAlgane, M. (2023). Exploring the Impact of AI on the EFL Context: A Case Study of Saudi Universities. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 23(2), 41–49.

Arnold, N., & Ducate, L. (2015). Contextualized views of practices and competencies in call teacher education research. Language, Learning and Technology, 19(1), 1-9.

Bailey, D., Southam, A., & Costley, J. (2021). Digital storytelling with chatbots: mapping L2 participation and perception patterns. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 18(1), pp. 85-103.

Bailin, A. (1987). Artificial intelligence and computer-assisted language instruction: A perspective. CALICO Journal, 5(3), 25–45.

Cassidy, C. (2023). Australian universities to return to ‘pen and paper’ exams after students caught using AI to write essays. [The Guardian news]. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian. com/Australia news/2023/jan/10/universities-to-return-topen-and-paper-exams-after-students-caught-using-ai-towrite-essays

Chandra, S., & Yuyun, I. (2018). The use of Google Translate in EFL essay writing. LLT Journal, 21(2), 228-238.

Desmet, P. (2009). L'enseignement/apprentissage des langues à l'ère du numérique: tendances récentes et défis. Revue française de linguistique appliquée, 11, 119-138.

Ding, A. C. E., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A., Lu, Y. H., & Glazewski, K. (2019). EFL teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and practices with regard to using technology. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 35(1), 20–39.

El Shazly, R. (2021). Effects of artificial intelligence on English speaking anxiety and speaking performance: A case study. Expert Systems, 38(3), e12667.

Enochsson, A., & Rizza, C. (2009). ICT in Initial Teacher Training: Research Review. OECD Education Working Papers, 38, OECD Publishing, Paris.

Fitria, T. (2021). Grammarly as AI-powered English writing assistant: Students’ alternative for writing English. Metathesis: Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching, 5(1), 65-78.

Gallacher, A., Thompson, A., & Howarth, M. (2018). “My robot is an idiot!” – Students’ perceptions of AI in the L2 classroom. In P. Taalas, J. Jalkanen, L. Bradley & S. Thouësny (Eds), Future-proof CALL: Language learning as exploration and encounters – short papers from EUROCALL 2018 (pp. 70-76).

Gayed, J. M, Carlon, M. K. J., Oriola, A. M., & Cross, J. S. (2022). Exploring an AI-based writing assistant’s impact on English language learners. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100055.

Holland, V. M., Maisano, R., Alderks, C., & Martin, J. (1993). Parsers in tutors: What are they good for? CALICO Journal, 11(1), 28–46.

Jaganathan, P., Maryam, H., & Ilangko, S. (2014). An Analysis of Google Translate Use in Decoding Contextual Semanticity among EFL Learners. Asian Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities, 4(9), 1-13.

Kabir, S. M. S. (2016). Methods Of Data Collection. Basic Guidelines for Research: An Introductory Approach for All Disciplines (first ed., pp. 201-275).

Kim, H. K., & Han, S. (2021). College students’ perceptions of AI-based writing learning tools: With a focus on Google Translate, Naver Papago, and Grammarly. Modern English Education, 22(4), 90-100.

Kol, S., Schcolnik, M., & Spector-Cohen, E. Google Translate in Academic Writing Courses? The EuroCALL Review, 26(2), 50-57.

Köse, U., & Arslan, A. (2015). E-Learning experience with artificial intelligence supported software: An international application on English language courses. GLOKALde, 1(3), 61-75.

Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Lee, H. (2020). Intelligent assistants in language learning: An analysis of features and limitations. In K.-M. Frederiksen, S. Larsen, L. Bradley & S. Thouësny (Eds), CALL for widening participation: Short papers from EUROCALL 2020 (pp.172-176).

Kurshan, B. (2016). The Future of Artificial Intelligence in Education.ìcial-ìntelligence- in-education/#35b8ffc42e4d

Last, R. (1989). Artificial intelligence techniques in language learning. Ellis Horwood.

Lidén, A., & Nilros, K. (2020). Perceived benefits and limitations of chatbots in higher education. Kalmar: Linnaeus University. Retrieved from

Lu, X. (2018). Natural language processing and Intelligent ComputerAssisted Language Learning (ICALL). The TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching, 1–6.

McCarthy, J., Minsky, M. L., Rochester, N., & Shannon, C. E. (1955). A Proposal for the Dartmouth summer conference on artificial intelligence. AI Magazine, 31 Aug, 1-13.

Medvedev, G. (2016). Google Translate in Teaching English. The journal of teaching English for specific and academic purposes, 4(1), 181–193. Retrieved from

Mediyawati, N., Young, J. C., & Nusantara, S. B. (2021). U-tapis: Automatic spelling filter as an effort to improve Indonesian language competencies of journalistic students. Cakrawala Pendidikan [Educational Horizon], 40(2), 402-412.

Nagata, N. (1996). Computer vs. workbook instruction in second language acquisition. CALICO Journal, 14(1), 53-75.

Ng, D. T. K., Luo, W., Chan, H. M. Y., & Chu, S. K. W. (2022). Using digital story writing as a pedagogy to develop AI literacy among primary students. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100054.

Nguyen, T. T. H. (2023). EFL Teachers’ Perspectives toward the Use of ChatGPT in Writing Classes: A Case Study at Van Lang University. International Journal of Language Instruction, 2(3), 1-47.

Nguyen, T. H. N., & Nguyen, T. T. H. (2022). Use of Google Docs in Teaching and Learning English Online to Improve Students’ Writing Performance. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 2(2), 186–200.

O’Brien, P. (1993). eL: AI in CALL. In M. Yazdani (Ed.), Multilingual multimedia. Bridging the language barrier with intelligent systems (pp. 85–139). Intellect.

Pace-Sigge, M. & Sumakul, D. T. (2021). What teaching an algorithm teaches when teaching students how to write academic texts (Manuscript submitted for publication).

Peter, J., & Singaravelu. (2020). Problems in writing in English among high school learners. Aegaeum Journal, 8(9), 1502-1515.

Phan, T. T. N., & Chen, C. H. (2020). Vietnamese engineering students’ perceptions of the use of Google Translation tool. Journal of Science and Technology, 48, 156-165.

Rieland, R. (2017). Is artificial intelligence the key to personalized education? Smithsonian Magazine.

Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2016). Artificial Intelligence A Modern Approach, 3rd Global Edition. Pearson.

Shumanov, M., & Johnson, L. (2021). Making conversations with chatbots more personalized. Computers in Human Behavior, 117(1), 106-627.

Sumakul, D. T., Hamied, F. A., & Sukyadi, D. (2022). Artificial intelligence in EFL classrooms: Friend or foe? LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 15(1), 232-256.

Sumakul, D. T., Hamied, F. A., & Sukyadi, D. (2022). Students’ Perceptions of the Use of AI in a Writing Class. Proceedings of the 67th TEFLIN International Virtual Conference & the 9th ICOELT 2021 (TEFLIN ICOELT 2021). In Strielkowski, W. (Ed.), Advances in Social Sciences, Education and Humanities Research (Volume 624). 103-144. Atlantis Press.

Susanto, D. A., & Yosephine, M. (2019). Teachers’ perceptions towards teaching writing using word games: The case study of junior high schools in Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia. Media Penelitian Pendidikan: Jurnal Penelitian Dalam Bidang Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 11(2), 1-9.

Tafazoli, D., María, E. G., & Abril, C. A. H. (2019). Intelligent language tutoring system: Integrating intelligent computer-assisted language learning into language education. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 15(3), 60-74.

Tran, V. H., & Dinh, T. M. H. (2021). Artificial intelligence in education: Opportunities and challenges for the future of teaching and studying at universities. Journal of Science and Technology - University of Danang, 19(2), 38–42.

Tran, T. M. L., & Nguyen, T. T. H. (2021). The Impacts of Technology-based Communication on EFL Students’ Writing. AsiaCALL Online Journal, 12(5), 54-76. Retrieved from

UNESCO. (2017). Fostering a culture of reading and writing: Examples of dynamic literate environments: Selected case studies. Institute for Lifelong learning.

Utami, S. P. T., Andayani, Winarni, R., & Sumarwati. (2023). Utilization of artificial intelligence technology in an academic writing class: How do Indonesian students perceive?. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4), ep450.

Vo, T. P. (2022). The tool has the application of artificial intelligence in teaching English writing. Proceedings of National Scientific Conference (UNC): Research and Teaching Foreign Languages, Linguistics and International Studies in Vietnam. Hanoi National University Publishing House, volume 2, p. 577-91.

Wilson, J., Ahrendt, C., Fudge, E. A., Raiche, A., Beard, G., & MacArthur, C. (2021). Elementary teachers’ perceptions of automated feedback and automated scoring: Transforming the teaching and learning of writing using automated writing evaluation. Computers & Education, 168, 104208.

Woolf, B. P., Chad, L. H., Chaudhri, V. K., & Kolodner, J. L. (2013). AI Grand Challenges for Education. AI Magazine, 34(4), 66-84.

Yin, J., Goh, T. T., Yang, B., & Xiaobin, Y. (2021). Conversation technology with micro-learning: The impact of chatbot-based learning on students’ learning motivation and performance. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(1), 154-177.

Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education–where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 16-39.




How to Cite

Phan, T. N. L. (2023). Students’ Perceptions of the AI Technology Application in English Writing Classes. Proceedings of the AsiaCALL International Conference, 4, 45–62.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.